Skip to content

Hospital claims:
42% more revenue recovered

For a large health system, we built a claims platform that matches EHR evidence to payer rules, automates routine authorisations and logs every decision. It is built to HIPAA requirements. Claims recovery rose 42%, and staff saved 15k hours.

Industry: HealthcareService: AI & AutomationUpdated

More claims revenue recovered
42%
Staff hours saved a year
15k
Per authorisation check
<2s

Overview

Project
at a glance

Industry
HealthcareA large health system handling thousands of procedures a day, each needing a fast check against payer policy.
How we worked
Dedicated product teamA healthcare solutions architect, a clinical data engineer and an MLOps lead worked inside the client's revenue cycle management (RCM) team.
Goal
Recover lost claims revenueClose the gap between what doctors record in the EHR and the evidence each payer needs to approve a procedure.
What we built
Prior authorisation AI platformA HIPAA-aligned data platform that pulls evidence from the EHR and checks it against payer rules, built into the client's existing RCM work.

The challenge

What was getting
in the way

The client's older RCM system depended on manual clinical reviews, and reviewers could not keep up with changing payer policies. Its medical necessity denial rate ran 42% above the national average, leaving millions in claims unrecovered.

Procedures waited 3-5 days for authorisation, and some were cancelled while patients waited. Clinical notes still moved by fax, so nobody could say which evidence had supported a decision.

  • Lost revenue

    Incomplete documentation triggered automatic payer denials, permanently losing 5-8% of potential net patient revenue.

  • Physician burnout

    Specialists spent 20% of their day on manual peer-to-peer reviews instead of patient care.

  • Compliance risk

    Sharing clinical notes by fax and older portals left gaps that auditors could flag under new HIPAA privacy rules.

The solution

What
we built

  1. 01

    Secure evidence extraction from the EHR

    We built a secure workflow that pulls clinical evidence from the EHR and strips out any personal information the payer does not need.

    Format
    Standard health-record format
    Security
    Built to HIPAA requirements
    Protocol
    TLS 1.3 HSM
  2. 02

    AI that reads payer policies

    AI tools read each payer's medical policy PDFs and match them against the patient's clinical documentation as it is written.

    Model
    AI assisted
    Checks
    Medical necessity
    Confidence
    Confidence threshold
  3. 03

    Traceable authorisation records

    Each automated authorisation is stored with the clinical reason codes behind the decision, giving a clear trail for payer audits.

    Audit
    Every decision logged
    Storage
    Write-once (WORM)
    Standard
    SOC 2-ready

Before and after

How the work
changed

Finding evidence

Before

Faxes and PDFs

Staff pulled clinical notes out by hand, so evidence was missed and denials stayed high.

After

Connected health records

Clinical data flows in live and is matched to payer policy automatically, within HIPAA rules.

Decision controls

Before

Reviewer judgement

Each decision depended on one reviewer's experience, with no consistent audit trail.

After

Clear, logged rules

Logs record the exact clinical details used to justify every authorisation.

Throughput

Before

3-5 Day Lag

Authorisation backlogs led to cancelled procedures and anxious patients.

After

Sub-2s scoring

Automatic scaling keeps responses under 2 seconds, even at peak clinical hours.

Key features

What made it
useful

  • HIPAA

    Patient data removal

    Language AI finds and anonymises sensitive patient data before anything reaches the AI models.

    Business impact

    Zero patient data leaks

  • AI assisted

    AI evidence gathering

    The AI works like an automated clerk, moving through EHR screens to find the exact lab result a payer asks for.

    Business impact

    94% evidence accuracy

  • Live updates

    Automatic payer requests

    An authorisation request goes out the moment a physician enters an order, with no wait for a person to pick it up.

    Business impact

    42% recovery lift

Results

The business
difference

  1. Revenue

    42% Recovery Increase

    Claims revenue recovered

    Claims that were often denied for missing information now go in with the right evidence, and recovery is 42% higher.

    Before: High-DenialAfter: 42% Higher

  2. Efficiency

    15,000 Annual Hours

    Staff hours saved each year

    AI now handles 90% of routine authorisations, so staff can focus on complex appeals.

    Before: ManualAfter: Automated

  3. Speed

    1.8s Response Time

    Authorisation response time

    Each automated authorisation check now returns in 1.8 seconds, so clinicians are not kept waiting on paperwork.

    Before: < 5sAfter: 1.8s

Faster delivery

Built on tested foundations

Reusing tested components saved about 8 weeks, which went into matching EHR evidence to each payer's policies.

  • HIPAA data platform module

    Gave the project a tested, HIPAA-aligned base for pulling EHR data into the client's private cloud.

  • Clinical knowledge module

    Gave the AI a tested clinical vocabulary for matching doctors' notes to payer policy wording.

  • Interoperability monitoring

    Alerted the team when an EHR connection slowed or failed, before authorisations began to queue.

  • RCM cost controls

    Tracked the cloud and AI cost of each authorisation as volumes grew.

Trust and control

How we kept it
safe and reliable

  • 01

    Clear reasons for every decision

    Each decision carries clinically mapped reason codes, which makes payer and regulatory audits easier.

    Audit ready
  • 02

    Patient data stays in your cloud

    All patient health information stays inside the client's virtual private cloud, covered by a business associate agreement (BAA).

    HIPAA
  • 03

    Reliable service

    The cloud platform runs at 99.99% uptime for essential clinical work.

    High availability
  • 04

    You own the code

    On completion, the client owns 100% of the IP in the AI models and custom health-record connections.

    100% owned

FAQ

Straight
answers

Have a different question? Ask it on a 30-minute call.

Book a call

Its revenue cycle team checked clinical evidence by hand and could not keep up with changing payer policies. Medical necessity denials ran 42% above the national average, and incomplete documentation cost 5-8% of potential net patient revenue. Specialists also spent 20% of their day on manual peer-to-peer reviews.

Stop losing revenue to avoidable denials

If prior authorisations still depend on manual chart reviews, we can help you match EHR evidence to payer rules automatically and keep a clear audit trail.